<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Metrics &#8211; SIM Score vs Net Reputation Score (NRS)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialcommercetoday.com/social-media-metrics-sim-score-vs-net-reputation-score-nrs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialcommercetoday.com/social-media-metrics-sim-score-vs-net-reputation-score-nrs/</link>
	<description>Trends &#38; Technologies in Social Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santiago</title>
		<link>http://socialcommercetoday.com/social-media-metrics-sim-score-vs-net-reputation-score-nrs/#comment-2634</link>
		<dc:creator>Santiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcommercetoday.com/?p=2127#comment-2634</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I think that the oficial NPS formula is number of promoters - number of detractors but in the article you apply number of promoters - all the others. Is that correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I think that the oficial NPS formula is number of promoters &#8211; number of detractors but in the article you apply number of promoters &#8211; all the others. Is that correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chloe Bags</title>
		<link>http://socialcommercetoday.com/social-media-metrics-sim-score-vs-net-reputation-score-nrs/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Chloe Bags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcommercetoday.com/?p=2127#comment-209</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ok. I believe you&#039;re appropriate!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ok. I believe you&#8217;re appropriate!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://socialcommercetoday.com/social-media-metrics-sim-score-vs-net-reputation-score-nrs/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcommercetoday.com/?p=2127#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I was very interested by your post as I always though the SIM score is pretty weird and not very relevant.
But I&#039;m not completly convinced by the NRS either. You mention the NPS, but isn&#039;t the NPS pu aside the &quot;neutral&quot; rating and only compares Promoters versus Detractors ?
As most social brand mention are neutral it&#039;s quite, you almost always get a negative NRS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I was very interested by your post as I always though the SIM score is pretty weird and not very relevant.<br />
But I&#039;m not completly convinced by the NRS either. You mention the NPS, but isn&#039;t the NPS pu aside the &quot;neutral&quot; rating and only compares Promoters versus Detractors ?<br />
As most social brand mention are neutral it&#039;s quite, you almost always get a negative NRS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esteban contreras</title>
		<link>http://socialcommercetoday.com/social-media-metrics-sim-score-vs-net-reputation-score-nrs/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>esteban contreras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcommercetoday.com/?p=2127#comment-207</guid>
		<description>This seemed promising.. But in reality, there is usually more neutral sentiment than positive and negative... so NRS can be negative too... and that is complicated and confusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seemed promising.. But in reality, there is usually more neutral sentiment than positive and negative&#8230; so NRS can be negative too&#8230; and that is complicated and confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priyanka Goswami</title>
		<link>http://socialcommercetoday.com/social-media-metrics-sim-score-vs-net-reputation-score-nrs/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Priyanka Goswami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcommercetoday.com/?p=2127#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Are &quot;Likes&quot; considered positive comments or is that a separate engagement metric all together?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are &quot;Likes&quot; considered positive comments or is that a separate engagement metric all together?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brands Need To Become More Social &#124; Eric S. Townsend Marketing (202) 494-4326 — Website &#38; Graphic Design, Ecommerce, Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Branding, Advertising, CD &#38; DVD Packaging, Lead Generation, Sales</title>
		<link>http://socialcommercetoday.com/social-media-metrics-sim-score-vs-net-reputation-score-nrs/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Brands Need To Become More Social &#124; Eric S. Townsend Marketing (202) 494-4326 — Website &#38; Graphic Design, Ecommerce, Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Branding, Advertising, CD &#38; DVD Packaging, Lead Generation, Sales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 16:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialcommercetoday.com/?p=2127#comment-205</guid>
		<description>[...] an interesting report on brands and their need to become more social was passed along by internet consultant greta weiner. a company called razorfish has developed a new index – the sim score – to determine where a brand&#8217;s reputation stands online. collaborating with partners, tns cymfony and the keller fay group, razorfish measured two factors – reach and likeability – to establish a brand&#8217;s sim score relative to its competitors. check it out! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an interesting report on brands and their need to become more social was passed along by internet consultant greta weiner. a company called razorfish has developed a new index – the sim score – to determine where a brand&#8217;s reputation stands online. collaborating with partners, tns cymfony and the keller fay group, razorfish measured two factors – reach and likeability – to establish a brand&#8217;s sim score relative to its competitors. check it out! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

