<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 35 Ways to Justify Social Media Investment&#8230;(Not)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialcommercetoday.com/35-ways-to-justify-social-media-investment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialcommercetoday.com/35-ways-to-justify-social-media-investment/</link>
	<description>Trends &#38; Technologies in Social Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:51:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dion Wise</title>
		<link>http://socialcommercetoday.com/35-ways-to-justify-social-media-investment/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Dion Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 05:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialcommercetoday.com/?p=878#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I know I am chiming in on this a bit late...but who know this may be a good thing as thought, experience and time are good ingredients for crystallising opinion.

If you are advocating $ spent for $ returned. Which I love the idea of. Hey we all like simple. However, it is rare you can easily attribute what generated a return unless the $ spent side of the equation is the only activity being undertaken (which lets face it is rare) ... and to further complicate matters depending on the product, the timing of when a encounters the product or brand to when they actually make a purchase (online or offline) can often be a very long time.

Any progress on these issues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I am chiming in on this a bit late&#8230;but who know this may be a good thing as thought, experience and time are good ingredients for crystallising opinion.</p>
<p>If you are advocating $ spent for $ returned. Which I love the idea of. Hey we all like simple. However, it is rare you can easily attribute what generated a return unless the $ spent side of the equation is the only activity being undertaken (which lets face it is rare) &#8230; and to further complicate matters depending on the product, the timing of when a encounters the product or brand to when they actually make a purchase (online or offline) can often be a very long time.</p>
<p>Any progress on these issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention 35 Ways to Justify Social Media Investment…(Not) &#124; Social Commerce Today -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://socialcommercetoday.com/35-ways-to-justify-social-media-investment/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention 35 Ways to Justify Social Media Investment…(Not) &#124; Social Commerce Today -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialcommercetoday.com/?p=878#comment-45</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Marsden, Eric Cole. Eric Cole said: 35 Ways to Justify Social Media Investment…(Not) &#124; Social Commerce ...: So you need to justify social media mar.. http://bit.ly/2ff39c [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Marsden, Eric Cole. Eric Cole said: 35 Ways to Justify Social Media Investment…(Not) | Social Commerce &#8230;: So you need to justify social media mar.. <a href="http://bit.ly/2ff39c" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2ff39c</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

